A Looming Economic Storm: The Global Impact of China’s Crisis and Western Uncertainty
A recent article by Australia’s ABC upon the state of the Chinese economy makes for sobering reading for the global economy (As Beijing quietly heads into economic oblivion while Washington lights up, expect tougher times ahead – ABC News). The summation of this article notes that as Graduate Chemical Engineer and Chinese leader Xi Jinping heads into a 4th term (and perhaps a 5th.. and a 6th… and a 7th….), China faces economic challenges that are likely to ripple across the global economy.
Over recent years, China’s economy (and it’s population growth) has been tethering on the precipice of recession. This has been made worse by the meltdown of the property market, with giant players such Evergrande collapsing into liquidation (Evergrande, symbol of China’s property crisis, heads to liquidation | CNN Business).
Not only does this impact foreign investors to the tune of tens of billions they will likely never see returned, but it is also likely to have an impact on those commodities and materials that China imports for its vast construction programmes.
Iron ore, Copper ore, Bauxite (Aluminium), Lime for cement and Silica (for both cement and glass), as well as the imports of coal and oil/gas that powers the “machines of construction” are likely to be impacted.
This has the potential to further worsen China’s balance of trade with its main global partners (mainly the USA (coming into an election) and the EU), especially if it continues to attempt to stabilise a faltering economy with more “forced” stimulus in building more high-rise buildings, bridges, and infrastructure few in China actually need.
Much of this infrastructure is upon, or is planned to be upon, what was previously productive rural lands. There is also the risk (as with the Evergrande collapse) that many of these projects will remain unfinished, and that global investors will think twice before re-investing in Chinese construction projects.
With so many countries’ economies underpinned by commodity exports to China, it would seem to be of importance to us all, especially if China dumps these “unused” commodities back onto the global market.
Adding to this “storm of uncertainty” is the weakening of the US jobs market (Weak US job numbers fuel fears as stock markets plunge (bbc.com)) and fears that the USA is also heading into recession. Given the wobble in the Dow Jones tends to send ripples across most of the European exchanges; then such weakening impacts us all as stock markets fall (US stocks tumble on fears over slowing growth (bbc.com)).
Such is also doubly concerning for UK workers, given the incoming Labour government’s plans of cancelling major infrastructure projects (initiated by the previous Conservative government) so they can (seemingly) pump money into pay rises for members of trade unions.
Such is unlikely to stop at Junior Doctors and the British Medical Association (BMA). Now that a 22% pay increase has been agreed for one unionised sector worker groups, then history shows us that it is likely we can expect the rest of the unions (that fund the Labour party to the tune of £7million – source (The Guardian) Who are the big Conservative and Labour donors? | Party funding | The Guardian) will come for pay rises like (metaphorical) pigs to the feeding trough. Despite Labour promises not to raise UK taxes, even that now seems inevitable as the Labour party seeks to placate their biggest trade union donors.

Uncertainty is rarely a good thing for industry and the engineering (and engineers) that supports it. Both the USA and China seem to be sailing into uncertain times, and potentially a tariff battle (something the EU is likely to follow suit with).
Looming tariffs and the potential for a fall in bulk construction material prices (should China decide to dump their stockpile back on to the global market), might make this European winter a bleak one. It is worth noting that many economists do not support tariffs being applied to global trade, given they are for the most a political tool (especially in election years as we currently have in the USA) and a clandestine way of collecting more tax from consumers.
Tariffs are paid by the domestic consumers and NOT the exporting country (China); effectively further financially penalising “local consumers” in a time that most of us (and the industries we work within) are being squeezed under the weight of cost-of-living increases outstripping income rises (unless you happen to be a Junior Doctor).
Governments forcing higher costs upon industry and businesses rarely fosters economic growth and prosperity – especially at a time when unions are likely to drive higher labour costs for their unionised workers. Perhaps, trade unions will take this “opportunity” to drive into insolvency those unionised manufacturing industries that are left “hanging on” in the UK?
The Unite Union’s recent actions against Tata Steel (Tata Steel workers call first strike for 40 years (bbc.com)) at a time that it is fighting for economic survival is to call for strikes; and thus hasten it’s demise. Is this history repeating given those once great UK industries and companies are no longer with us?
Looking at the Wiki page for “Defunct manufacturing companies of the United Kingdom” (Category:Defunct manufacturing companies of the United Kingdom – Wikipedia) makes for depressing reading. Many of these companies had a strong union presence; something that could be argued was a major factor in making them non-competitive in a global market; and thus, no longer with us.
Unions would of course argue otherwise, however the coal miners strikes clearly didn’t benefit the coal mining industry, so I’d question how the Tata Steel strikes are expected to prolong steel making in the UK??!!
It is no surprise reading the response from Dubai’s Sindara following their withdrawal from the take-over bid for one of the UK’s largest Engineering Service Provider in Wood Group (Wood group takeover Takeover bid for Scottish engineering giant Wood collapses (bbc.com)).
Sindara were quoted as saying that the decision came “in light of rising geopolitical risks and financial market uncertainty“. When commodities wobble, Engineering service providers (who employ so many of us) do as well.
Time will tell how such “uncertainty” impacts Engineering projects in the UK and Ireland (both current and planned). The only certainty seems that taxes will rise, and that the cost of living will squeeze us all even more. A bleak Winter indeed…Time will tell if it becomes one of discontent.













I daresay that you are correct about unions and collapsed businesses but one other factor you do not mention is the UK being outside the Social Chapter. In the pharmaceutical industry, at least, it appears that big pharma closed manufacturing sites in the UK because they could and kept other sites in the EU open because it was so much easier to close the UK site.
This is purely anecdotal but it is something that in my opinion deserves more research.
Hello Keith,
You make an interesting point and one which I will take the time to investigate.
I would expect that the decline in UK Pharma has been a long time coming. I moved to the UK in 1997 and there were rich pickings as to pharma jobs and sites to work at. Back then, it was mostly API. I moved to Ireland shortly after this due to there being a greater concentration of sites within smaller (geographical) areas and the diversity of both API and Biotech.
So, in my view, whilst the EU charter on workers’ rights and conditions may be relevant (at this time I don’t know / can’t say), there were other factors.
1. Decline of API in UK and Ireland (I see many of the API sites in Ireland are also no more) – this is due to many factors.
a) Environmental controls and emission
b) Cheaper to make API in “low cost” regions and then ship concentrated final product to Europe for finishing and packaging.
2. Emergence of bioscience / biotech – Ireland embraced this and invested, thus captured much of the industry that may well have gone to the UK, but didn’t.
a) Bio-pharma needs end-to-end specialist care and manufacturing, where as API doesn’t to the same extent. This needs a special workforce. In part, this is why Switzerland and Sweden (with their high living costs, but well educated work-force) can be competitive in Bio-Pharma manufacturing.
b) I don’t see that the UK has invested to the same extent as other regions – especially in Education. Bio-Pharma is very much dependent upon the workforce (much more so than API), and that API manufacturing skillsets aren’t always relevant to the cleanroom / bio-secure environment of bio-pharma.
c) Quality of engineering service providers and engineering generally in the UK is way behind Ireland. It should be no surprise given most projects and sites I work on have a healthy core of Irish workers and operators. As above, I’d put that in part to the superior educations standards in Ireland over the UK, and the better opportunities people have coming out of University. I am not Irish, but have lectured in both UK and Ireland, as well as having children of school age in both countries. My experience is that the Irish state education is vastly superior from what my children had in UK. I also have the opination that the graduated coming out of Irish Universities are more equipped for work in industry.