Editorial ArchiveMaintenance and Health & SafetyMaintenance, Health & Safety

Why Mechanical Maintenance Isn’t Optional on UK Chemical Sites

By Brad Wilson, Sales Director at Richard Alan Engineering

Listen to this article
Brad Wilson - Mechanical Maintenance expert

I’ve spent the better part of a decade in engineering, currently working for the Richard Alan Group, a firm that’s been quietly and reliably keeping chemical plants running since the 1970s. We don’t make headlines, we don’t chase awards, what we do is show up early and with the right tools to fix what’s broken, prevent what’s predictable and extend what’s essential.

If you’ve ever walked through a chemical manufacturing facility in the UK, you’ll know there’s a beat to the place; pumps pulse, valves click, reactors hum, conveyors glide; It’s a symphony of steel, gears, steam and pressure.

But here’s the thing: that symphony doesn’t play itself.

Behind every note is a team of engineers, technicians and maintenance professionals making sure that nothing skips a beat. And if you think that’s just poetic license, think again, because in our industry, mechanical maintenance isn’t poetry, it’s survival.

During my time within the engineering sector, I’ve seen too many sites treat mechanical maintenance as an afterthought; a cost centre, a box to be ticked, a nuisance that gets in the way of production. But let me be blunt: the above mindset is dangerous, expensive and quite frankly, outdated.

The Cost of Complacency

I remember visiting a client in Runcorn a few years ago. This was a big site, with a large production output.  I was asked by the Maintenance Manger to look at a selection of pumps.  As I started to ask key questions about their maintenance scheduling, it transpired that they had been running one critical centrifugal pump well past its recommended service interval. “It’s still running fine,” the plant manager told me with a shrug of his shoulders; “Why fix what ain’t broke

But three weeks later, it did brake, catastrophically.

A bearing had seized, resulting in a ruptured seal, this meant 8,000 litres of caustic solution flooded the pump room. Production halted for 3 days, a clean-up team was called and unfortunately the HSE was involved.  The final financial hit was over £200,000 in lost production, remediation and fines, not to mention the reputational damage to the business.

That particular pump had an asset value of £12,000, with the service they skipped worth just £3,500 – You do the maths.

What’s worrying is this isn’t an isolated case; across the UK chemical industry, deferred maintenance is quietly bleeding companies dry.  According to the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, unplanned downtime costs UK manufacturers an estimated £180 billion annually and chemical plants with their complex systems, are among the hardest hit.

But it’s not just about the money.

Safety:

In our world, mechanical failure doesn’t just mean lost revenue, it means risk, real, tangible, sometimes tragic risk.  Think about it, a corroded flange on a pressurised line carrying chlorine gas, a worn gearbox on a mixer handling volatile organic compounds or a fatigued impeller in a pump moving sulphuric acid.  These aren’t hypotheticals, they’re ticking time bombs and maintenance is the only tool we have to defuse them.

“Mechanical integrity isn’t optional, it’s the bedrock of safety and in an industry already under intense regulatory scrutiny from COMAH to DSEAR to PUWER, cutting corners on maintenance isn’t just reckless, it’s legally indefensible.”

“Mechanical integrity isn’t optional, it’s the bedrock of safety and in an industry already under intense regulatory scrutiny from COMAH to DSEAR to PUWER, cutting corners on maintenance isn’t just reckless, it’s legally indefensible.”

I’ll never forget an incident at a site in the Southeast back in 2019. A seemingly minor vibration in a compressor was ignored for “a few more months.” The vibration turned into a fracture and the fracture turned into a rupture. Thankfully, no one was seriously hurt but three employees were treated for minor chemical exposure and the plant was shut down for nearly a week while an internal & external investigation was conducted.  The root cause was identified as inadequate vibration analysis and missed alignment checks both of which should & would play a large part of any standard mechanical maintenance programme.

The lesson: mechanical integrity isn’t optional, it’s the bedrock of safety and in an industry already under intense regulatory scrutiny from COMAH to DSEAR to PUWER, cutting corners on maintenance isn’t just reckless, it’s legally indefensible.

The Hidden ROI of Preventative Care

Let’s flip the script for a moment, what if, instead of seeing maintenance as a cost, we saw it as an investment, because that’s exactly what it is.

Take predictive maintenance, for example, vibration monitoring, thermography, oil analysis, ultrasonic leak detection, these aren’t sci-fi gadgets, they’re proven, accessible technologies that can spot failure before it happens.

One of our clients in West Yorkshire implemented a condition-based monitoring programme across their rotating assets. In the first 18 months, they identified 17 potential failures, which were all addressed during planned shutdowns. The result was zero unplanned downtime, a 40% reduction in emergency callouts and a payback period of just 11 months.

That’s not luck, that’s strategy.

And it’s not just high tech solutions, sometimes, it’s the basics done brilliantly, like lubrication schedules followed to the letter, torque specs double-checked, gaskets replaced before they fail and couplings inspected for wear.  These small acts performed consistently and documented meticulously add up to massive gains in reliability, efficiency and lifespan.  I’ve seen pumps that should’ve been scrapped after five years still running strong at 15 years, not because they were magical, but because someone cared enough to maintain them.

The Skills Gap And How to Bridge It

Here’s the uncomfortable truth, mechanical maintenance is suffering from an image problem.  To many young engineers see it as dirty work, to many managers see it as low value and to many procurement teams see it as easily outsourced and this kind of thinking has created a skills gap that’s only getting bigger.

According to Engineering UK, estimates point to a shortfall of approximately one million engineers by 2030 if current trends continue. Yet, maintenance roles, particularly in heavy industry struggle to attract talent.

Why? Because we’ve failed to tell the story.

We haven’t shown young people that mechanical maintenance isn’t just tightening bolts, it’s diagnosing complex systems, it’s interpreting data, it’s solving puzzles under pressure and it’s being the person who stops a £10 million production line from going down.

“Technology gives you data, people give you insight and in an industry as complex and unforgiving as chemical manufacturing, you need both.”

“Technology gives you data, people give you insight and in an industry as complex and unforgiving as chemical manufacturing, you need both.”

At Richard Alan, we’ve started partnering with local colleges and apprenticeship schemes to change that narrative, we bring students onto site and let them shadow our engineers and allow them to get their hands dirty; safely, of course and you know what, they love it.  Because when you strip away the misconceptions, mechanical maintenance is deeply satisfying work. It’s tangible, it’s critical and in an age of automation and AI, it’s strongly human.

The Regulatory Landscape And Why It’s Your Friend

Let’s be honest, nobody wakes up excited to deal with HSE inspectors or COMAH audits, but here’s the thing the regulations aren’t the enemy, they’re the framework, the safety net and the checklist that keeps us honest.

And mechanical maintenance is at the heart of compliance.

Take PUWER (Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998). It doesn’t just say “maintain your equipment”, it specifies how, when, by whom and with what records. Or DSEAR (Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002), it demands that equipment in hazardous zones is maintained to prevent ignition sources, which means everything from anti-static brushes to explosion proof motors needs regular, documented checks.

Ignore these and you’re not just risking fines; you’re risking your licence to operate.

But here’s the good news: if you’re doing mechanical maintenance right, compliance becomes almost automatic. Your logs become your evidence, your schedules become your shield and your engineers/technicians become your ambassadors.

I’ve sat in dozens of audits over the years, the ones that go smoothly.  They’re the ones where the maintenance team can pull up a file, show the last five service reports, point to the trending vibration data and explain why Asset 3472 was pulled offline last Tuesday.

That’s not bureaucracy; that’s professionalism.

The Role of Partnerships – Why You Don’t Have to Go It Alone

Let’s be realistic, not every chemical site has the budget, the space, or the expertise to maintain every piece of equipment in-house; and that’s okay.  What’s not okay is treating external maintenance providers as interchangeable commodities.

At Richard Alan, we don’t just send a van and a spanner, we embed ourselves, we learn your processes, we map your critical assets, we align our schedules with your shutdowns and we share our data.

Why? Because your success is our success.

I’ve lost count of the number of times we’ve been called in as “firefighters” only to discover that with a little planning, a little partnership and a little preventative care, the fire never needed to start.

One client in Birmingham was spending £80,000 a year on emergency repairs. We audited their maintenance logs, restructured their service intervals and trained their in-house team on basic diagnostics. Within two years, their emergency spend dropped to £18,000 and they hadn’t lost a single day to unplanned downtime.

That’s the power of partnership.

Technology: Your Ally, Not Your Replacement

There’s a lot of buzz right now about Industry 4.0. Digital twins, AI-driven predictive analytics and IoT sensors on every flange; and yes it’s exciting, it’s powerful and whether we like it or not, it’s the future.  But let’s not kid ourselves, technology doesn’t replace engineers, it empowers them. A vibration sensor can tell you a bearing is failing, but it can’t tell you why. Was it misalignment, maybe a lubrication failure, or a contamination and that’s where human expertise comes in.

At Richard Alan, we’ve invested heavily in digital tools, from cloud-based CMMS platforms to real-time asset health dashboards, but our most valuable asset is still our people because technology gives you data, people give you insight and in an industry as complex and unforgiving as chemical manufacturing, you need both.

Culture: The Secret Ingredient

You can have the best mechanical maintenance strategy in the world, the shiniest tools, the smartest software, the most detailed schedules, but if your culture doesn’t value maintenance, none of it matters.

I’ve seen sites where maintenance is treated as a second-class function, scheduled around production, under-resourced, constantly interrupted, but I’ve also seen sites where maintenance is seen as the guardian of uptime, consulted on design changes, involved in planning, celebrated for preventing disasters.

“They’re the silent guardians of safety, efficiency and continuity and in an industry where the stakes are this high, we owe them more than gratitude, we owe them investment, respect and priority.”

“They’re the silent guardians of safety, efficiency and continuity and in an industry where the stakes are this high, we owe them more than gratitude, we owe them investment, respect and priority.”

Guess which one runs smoother?

Building a maintenance-first culture starts at the top. It means giving maintenance a seat at the table, it means measuring KPIs beyond “uptime” things like average time between failures, schedule compliance and engineer utilisation. It means recognising that the person who keeps the line running is just as vital as the person who designed it.

Looking Ahead: Mechanical Maintenance in a Net Zero World

As the UK chemical industry races toward its 2050 net zero targets, mechanical maintenance is going to play an even bigger role, Why? Because efficiency is sustainability.

A well-maintained pump uses less energy, a properly aligned motor generates less heat, a leak-free system wastes less raw material, a predictive maintenance programme reduces spare part consumption.  Mechanical maintenance isn’t just about preventing failure, it’s about optimising performance and in a carbon-constrained world, that’s more valuable than ever.

We’re already working with clients to retrofit older assets with energy-efficient components, to implement condition monitoring that reduces unnecessary runtime and to extend asset life, because the greenest machine is the one you don’t have to replace.

Final Thoughts: The Quiet Heroes

I’ll end where I began, with rhythm.

The rhythm of a chemical plant isn’t accidental, it’s engineered, maintained, protected and behind that rhythm are people, engineers, mechanics, fitters, welders, electricians, planners, supervisors plus many others. 

They don’t wear capes, they don’t give keynote speeches, but when a bearing starts to scream, or a seal begins to leak, or a gearbox starts to shudder, they’re the ones who step in, calm, competent and unflappable.

They’re the silent guardians of safety, efficiency and continuity and in an industry where the stakes are this high, we owe them more than gratitude, we owe them investment, respect and priority.  Because on a chemical site in the UK or anywhere, for that matter, mechanical maintenance isn’t a cost.

It’s the cost of doing business right.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Why is mechanical maintenance essential on chemical sites?
It ensures safety, compliance and operational reliability by preventing equipment failures that could lead to accidents, downtime or environmental harm.

What happens if mechanical maintenance is neglected?
Deferred maintenance increases the risk of mechanical failure, unplanned shutdowns and potential legal consequences under COMAH, DSEAR and PUWER.

What are the biggest risks of mechanical failure?
Corroded flanges, worn gearboxes, seized bearings and fatigued impellers can all lead to leaks, spills or explosions in hazardous chemical environments.

How can predictive maintenance help?
Techniques like vibration analysis, thermography and oil testing detect early signs of failure so repairs can be made before breakdowns occur.

What role does culture play in maintenance success?
A culture that values maintenance as a core safety function improves reliability, encourages accountability and ensures smoother audits.

How can companies bridge the maintenance skills gap?
By investing in apprenticeships, training and partnerships with technical colleges to attract and develop the next generation of engineers.

Are regulations like COMAH and DSEAR barriers or benefits?
They’re frameworks that keep sites safe and accountable. When maintenance is done right, compliance with these regulations becomes almost automatic.

Can external partnerships improve maintenance outcomes?
Yes, working with trusted engineering partners helps sites access specialist knowledge, reduce emergency repairs and improve asset performance.

How does technology support maintenance teams?
Digital twins, condition monitoring and IoT sensors provide real-time asset health data while experienced engineers interpret and act on that information.

What’s the link between maintenance and sustainability?
Efficiently maintained equipment consumes less energy and raw materials, reducing emissions and helping chemical sites progress toward net zero.

Show More

    Would you like further information about this article?

    Add your details below and we'll be in touch ASAP!


    Input this code: captcha

    Brad Wilson

    I’m Brad Wilson, Sales Director at Richard Alan Engineering, where I’ve proudly served for the best past of four years. With over a decade of experience in process engineering, I’ve had the privilege of collaborating with many of the UK’s leading manufacturers across a diverse range of industries, from food and beverage to chemical and beyond. Before joining Richard Alan, I spent six formative years at Alliance Fluid Handling, where I specialised in hygienic engineering solutions. There, I developed and delivered comprehensive maintenance contracts and emergency breakdown cover, always with a focus on minimising downtime and maximising operational efficiency. What drives me every day is a deep commitment to exceptional customer service and a genuine appreciation for the vital role maintenance teams play in keeping production businesses running smoothly. I believe that reliability, responsiveness, and strong partnerships aren’t just nice-to-haves, they’re essential to success in our industry. At Richard Alan Engineering, I bring that same passion and dedication to every client relationship, ensuring we deliver not just products, but peace of mind.
    Back to top button

    Join 25,000 process industry specialists and subscribe to:

    PII has a global network of suppliers ready to help...