Editorial ArchiveEnergy & HeatEnergy & Power, Heating, Cooling & Drying

Why Dimpled Heat Exchanger Tubes Work When Smooth Tubes Don’t

By Stan Baker, Senior Director at Teralba

Listen to this article
Stan Baker- Expert in dimpled heat exchanger tubes

People outside the industry often imagine heat exchangers as tidy bits of piping that “just work.” Not quite. Most exchangers don’t have moving parts, so that’s a good thing, but they still cause major headaches. Over-surfacing and fouling… the combinational nightmare of the O+G industry and exactly where dimpled heat exchanger tubes start to earn their keep.

Every design engineer wants their design to work. They just don’t need the headache of explaining why when it does not.

So what do you all do? Design, add some, and then add a margin, for safety. Makes perfect sense right? But… (there is always a but.)

“If you indent a tube, the flow stops gliding politely along the wall. It gets jostled.”

What this actually means is that the heat transfer performance suffers. The velocities slip and boundary layer thicken and settle in like a bored cat, refusing to shift, and at that point, you can add as much surface area as your budget can stand and still barely shift another kilowatt. Throw some fouling into the mix and you’ve basically built yourself a metal sculpture that transfers heat only on alternate Thursdays.

This is the environment in which the dimpled tube – specifically the Dimpleflo® dimpled heat exchanger tube – has quietly earned a place. Nobody needs to pretend it’s revolutionary. It’s just one of the few changes you can make to a tube that stops the boundary layer region behaving as if it's retired.


What Dimpled Heat Exchanger Tubes Actually Do (minus the marketing story)

If you indent a tube, the flow stops gliding politely along the wall. It gets jostled. Think: rough play in a footy match.  Not aggressively, just enough to disrupt the thick, dead zone that clings to the metal.

Each dimple breaks the boundary layer, creates some eddies and vortices in the flow behaviour, and then another dimple does it again before the fluid has time to settle back into sluggishness. This repeated disruption is the core reason dimpled heat exchanger tubes enhance heat transfer compared with smooth tubing.

There’s no magic in it. In duties that lean toward the dreaded laminar, or where viscosity has got ideas of its own, this disruption makes the wall side more honest. And yes, sometimes you get heat-transfer increases that look almost suspicious on paper – three, sometimes nearly four times better than the smooth tube that came before (fact).

That performance jump is exactly why dimpled tube heat exchangers are increasingly specified in difficult duties and if smooth tubes behaved properly, no one would have bothered with any of this!

Why Dimple Geometry Matters More Than You Think

Here’s the bit everyone glosses over: dimpled heat exchanger tube geometry doesn’t come in a neat one-size pattern. Change the depth and the flow behaves differently. Change the pitch and the effect shifts again. Move the circumferential spacing and everything downstream decides to rewrite the rules.

It’s not the kind of thing you “design once.” It’s a maddening little quirk where tweaking one dimension rattles the other two. Exactly the sort of problem that would send an enthusiastic graduate scanning the CFD plots at 10 p.m. while an older engineer mutters something about “stupid fluids” and leaves for the night.

The upshot is that you tune the geometry the same way you tune half the kit in a process plant: slowly, irritably, with a faint sense that the fluid is laughing at you until it finally stops misbehaving.


Using CFD and Plant Testing to Validate Dimpled Tubes (some computers have their place…)

CFD has been useful in understanding where shear spikes, where reattachment happens, and how far each disturbance travels. That’s fine for water, oil, and other fluids that behave themselves in simulation.

But anyone who has ever tried to model fruit purée, wastewater sludge, spent yeast, or anything with “rheology: complicated” in the file header knows you eventually have to test it on real hardware. And that’s where Dimpleflo has been built up properly: physical, side-by-side comparisons with smooth tubes, no excuses. These tests are what turned dimpled heat exchanger tubes from an interesting idea into accepted plant hardware.

Engineers have seen enough of these tests now to stop arguing about whether it works:

  • the wall transfers heat better;
  • fouling slows down;
  • temperatures come into line faster;
  • and pressure drop, despite early panic, stays almost the same once the exchanger is shortened to match the improved coefficient.

CFD may predict the trend, but the plant tests shut everyone up.


“Engineers have seen enough of these tests now to stop arguing about whether it works:”

Pressure Drop in Dimpled Heat Exchanger Tubes: Yes, there is a penalty, BUT: Yes there is a solution

You'd think adding these disturbances would hammer the pressure drop. Locally, it does, but total system pressure? Oddly enough, it doesn’t budge much. Because when the heat-transfer rate jumps up, you don’t need a mile-long exchanger. And a shorter run of tube means less friction. It’s one of those rare process-engineering outcomes where the universe allows a win without demanding a sacrifice on another line of the spreadsheet.

Engineers confronted with the data tend to blink twice, shrug, and go: “Well… alright then.”


Where Dimpled Heat Exchanger Tubes Make Sense

No need for mystique: dimpled heat exchanger tubes prove their worth in jobs smooth tubes aren’t made for.

“Dimpleflo-type dimpled tubes don’t solve everything, and you shouldn’t expect them to.”

  • Viscous streams where Reynolds numbers are an insult.
  • Fouling services where wall films turn into wallpaper paste.
  • Heat recovery from fluids that look like they escaped from a drain.
  • Retrofits where everything else is fixed and the tubing is the only thing you’re allowed to change.

The Real Verdict on Dimpled Tube Heat Exchangers (without the gloss)

Dimpleflo-type dimpled tubes don’t solve everything, and you shouldn’t expect them to. But they handle the awkward middle ground better than most kit: the sticky, the slow, the transitional, the sludgy, the uncooperative. They interfere with the boundary layer in a way that’s just assertive enough to matter, but not so aggressive that you’re introducing new mechanical grief.

No miracle. No disruption. Just a small geometric adjustment that does something genuinely useful in real plants.

For most process engineers, that’s more than enough.


FAQs

What are dimpled heat exchanger tubes?

Dimpled heat exchanger tubes are tubes with engineered surface indentations designed to disrupt the boundary layer and enhance heat transfer.

Why do dimpled tubes improve heat transfer?

The dimples create repeated flow disturbances that prevent stagnant boundary layers from forming along the tube wall.

Do dimpled heat exchanger tubes increase pressure drop?

Local pressure losses increase but total system pressure drop is often similar once the exchanger is shortened to match improved performance.

Are dimpled tubes suitable for fouling services?

Yes they are particularly effective in viscous and fouling duties where smooth tubes perform poorly.

Can dimpled heat exchanger tubes be used in retrofits?

Yes they are often used in retrofits where shell size and layout are fixed and only the tubing can be changed.

Show More

    Would you like further information about this article?

    Add your details below and we'll be in touch ASAP!


    Input this code: captcha

    Stan Baker

    Stan Baker has been recalibrating the boundaries of heat-exchange design since the late 1980s, when he began pushing Dimpleflo into operating regimes that made smooth-tube advocates quietly re-evaluate their CFD models. Where others accepted laminar decay, boundary-layer stagnation and predictable fouling as “the way things are,” Stan treated them as signs of insufficient imagination — or insufficient turbulence. His push for engineered disturbance was criticised as “overly aggressive.” Stan considered it basic optimisation: increase secondary flow patterns, disrupt the thermal boundary layer, raise the Nusselt number, and stop pretending Reynolds limitations are an impossible hurdle. Under his influence, Dimpleflo systems demonstrated higher overall heat-transfer coefficients, reduced fouling factors, improved shear uniformity, and impressive stability across wildly variable viscosities - much to the discomfort of engineers still clinging to textbook-era design charts. Today, among practitioners who prefer actual performance data over sentimental attachment to smooth tubes, Stan is regarded as The Heat-Transfer Rules Disrupter - the man who replaced convention with quantifiable results and did so with the kind of British understatement that suggests he’d expected the numbers to prove him right from the beginning.
    Back to top button

    Join 25,000 process industry specialists and subscribe to:

    PII has a global network of suppliers ready to help...